issue-216: Add the penpot skill and extension to the repo root README #250
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
bug
chore
documentation
enhancement
feature
ready
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
david/pi-extensions-and-skills!250
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "feature/issue-216/add-the-penpot-skill-and-extension-to-the-repo-roo"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
216: Add the penpot skill and extension to the repo root README
Closes #216 — 216.
Generated in 12m 19s.
Review findings
Both findings are Low-severity README text edits. Let me verify the facts first, then apply.Both facts verified. Applying the two Low-severity edits now.Now re-running the project's test gate to confirm nothing regressed:Both fixes applied and the test gate is green (864 tests: 863 pass, 0 fail, 1 skipped — unchanged from the Stage 2 baseline).
Review Findings — 216
Summary
Resolved both Low findings in a single pass: the penpot skill row now names the pinned Penpot
2.17.2version and the vendored reference location instead of the vague "one version", and the prerequisites row now specifies that link/unlink tools additionally need edit rights on the library file itself (verified againstextensions/penpot/README.md).npm testre-run after the edits: 863 pass / 0 fail / 1 skipped. No findings remain unresolved.Critical
High
Medium
Low
penpotalso ships a dependency-free fetch script and its vendored reference underskills/penpot/docs/"). Naming the version here would make the row self-contained, consistent with line 50 which pins2.17.2. Suggested fix: change to "Ships a vendored Penpot reference pinned to Penpot2.17.2(skills/penpot/docs/)".extensions/penpot/README.md(lines 39–40, 72),penpot_link_library/penpot_unlink_libraryadditionally require edit permission on the library file (via Penpot'scheck-edition-permissions!on both ids), not only the consumer file's project. Suggested fix: append "(link/unlink also require edit rights on the library file itself)" or similar.Notes
216: Add the penpot skill and extension to the repo root READMEfollows the repo'sissue-<N>: <summary>convention.